Saturday, December 23, 2006

Smith & Wesson M&P9

I got a bad case of the "just gots to have a 9mm semiauto" and after much looking, bought an S&W M&P 9mm. Bought it for all the "right" reasons: Good reviews (see prevous entry); great ergonomics and S&W's deserved reputation for standing behind their products. Result: Great ergonomics, great feel while shooting, fired every round I've put in it without a hitch. I just have a hard time putting the rounds around the center of the target with reasonable accuracy. Still dithering over whether it's my poor shooting skills, or the gun just isn't sighted properly. Shoots consistently ~4" low at 15 yards. When I don't get disgusted and start trying to find the "right" sight picture I can shoot reasonable groups with 90% of the rounds going in a pretty tight group. The other 10% are "oh, wow, why did I do that?" variety.

Off to the range today for one more try. If it keeps up, I may be putting this puppy on the market for one that I can shoot, or finding out how much $$$ it takes to adjust my problems onto the target.

Objective Handgun Evaluations-Mission Impossible

I spend (too much?) time trolling handgun forums. One of the common-running threads is "which xx pistol?" or some variation. The other is "I just bought an XXX and let me tell you how wonderful it is" Getting a real objective evaluation is almost impossible.

Typical comments in the .22 threads run along the lines of "this is the best handgun ever made" or "this is the worst ever made." I love the line of "eats ammo like jelly beans" which usually is amid of "won't fire hardly anything" for the same pistol. You also read about accuracy with almost impossible groups at almost impossible ranges. Most don't show pictures of typical groups, or say if they get them from a rest or freehand. I also like the threads with comments on the lower-priced brands, usually being trashed by people who don't own them and never fired one. One of my favorites is responses to Heritage Rough Rider pistols which go on to say that you should by a Ruger Single Six because the Rough Rider is made of inferior materials and it is not a gun that can be passed down two or more generations. It would appear that if you want to buy a new family heirloom, buy anything, shoot it a couple of times so it can be said that "granddad shot this" put it up in preservative in a temperature/humidity controlled area. If you follow the threads long enough, although some brands get more postive reviews, every handgun made is simultaneously the best, most accurate, most ammo insensitive ever made or the worst ever made.

Centerfire pistols are much the same way. Brand X is either "great, best shooter ever and I can't wait to buy the next model or more of this model" or "worst gun ever made and wash your hands multiple times if you even think about touching it." One of the best examples of this is the Hi-Point brand. If, on all but the Hi-Point forum, you ask about them, you almost hear the spit before the name is typed. My experience with them: 5 9mm rounds in a 2 inch group at 15 yards and 4 .45 rounds in a 2" group at 17 yards. Every round chambered and ever round went "bang" when I pulled the trigger.

It's darned hard to get an objective evaluation of handguns on forums, or for that matter from gun reviews. Rarely do you hear "I bought one, and it doesn't shoot at all well for me," or, "I bought one and don't like it enough to recommend that anyone else buy one." It takes a lot of sifting to get an objective evaluation because in opinions, unlike noses, everyone has more than one and most really aren't objective.

That being said: the (Ruger MKIII Hunter, MKIII 22/45, S&W 22A, Ruger Single Six) is the best handgun ever made, drives tacks at 50 yards and will shoot almost any ammo without problems. All because I happen to own these. (If they drove tacks at 50 yards, I'd need a large area with contiguous tacks, if I were doing the shooting). Actually, my guess is that most of them do reasonably well at the use they were intended. But it is certainly fun to read the comments and reviews.

Friday, December 22, 2006

Continued Addiction

The Ruger MKIII Hunter turned out to be a great gun buy, if you like hand guns. The problem with Ruger pistols is there is a great aftermarket for tweaks. The addition of an adjustable trigger, replacement sear and hammer turned this pistol into a fine shooter. Of course, one isn't enough. I added a Ruger Single Six .22 revolver, then decided I just had to have a 9mm pistol and just couldn't pass up the $200 Ruger MKIII 22/45 .22 pistol at Gander Mountain.

Do I shoot any better? Not really. Do I spend more on shooting, you betcha. Do I enjoy it more? You betcha.